People v. VanMATRE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not violate Blakely when it imposed an aggravated sentence to community corrections based on defendant's five prior misdemeanor convictions
• holding that the express consent statute does not require “actual physical movement of a vehicle” or for the “vehicle [to] travel any particular distance”
• holding the defendant operated a vehicle even though the vehicle could not move because it lacked fuel and the battery was dead
• evidence that the defendant was found in the driver’s seat of an operable vehicle and tried to start it with the key when an officer approached was sufficient evidence of driving

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).