Skip to main content
· 5/11/2016

People v. Valdez (Antonio)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “damages are an essential element in pleading a RESPA claim” and requiring a “causal link” between alleged violation and damages
  • “[T]he use of ‘additional’ seems to indicate that a plaintiff cannot recover pattern-or-practice damages in the absence of actual damages.” (dicta)
  • “[T]he use of ‘additional’ seems to indicate that a plaintiff cannot recover pattern-or-practice damages [under RESPA] in the absence of actual damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.