People v. Vaca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] court may properly take judicial notice of matters of public record without converting a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment.”
• “A federal court sitting in diversity applies the substantive law of the state in which it sits.”
• “A federal court sitting in diversity applies the substantive law of the state in which it sits.”
• “A federal court sitting in diversity applies the substantive law of the state in which it sits.”
• “A presiding judge is not required to recuse [her]self simply because of unsupported or highly tenuous speculation.”
• “[C]ollateral estoppel . . . bars the re- litigation of specific issues that were actually determined in a prior action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).