People v. Upshur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding nothing prevents a trial court from considering the extreme age difference of the victim in sentencing, where victim was 5 weeks old and appellant was charged with aggravated assault
• finding substantial question based upon allegation that the court “exceeded the recommended range in the sentencing guidelines without providing an adequate basis”
• stating claim that sentence is excessive and court erred in imposing unreasonable sentence outside of sentencing guidelines challenges discretionary aspects of sentencing
• “Objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a motion to modify the sentence imposed”
• citation 7 The sentencing order indicated that restitution was “imposed as part of the sentence” and “due immediately unless the court established a payment plan.” See Order, 9/20/23, at 1. -7- J-S24019-24 omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).