People v. Umar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that State law requires only “floor” as opposed to “ceiling” health coverage
• municipal acts presumed to be valid, upheld unless inconsistent with State or Federal law
• domestic partner is not “spouse” within meaning of health insurance statute
• excluding the word “spouse” to exclude domestic partners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).