Skip to main content

People v. Ulman

Citations

  • 625 N.W.2d 429
  • 244 Mich. App. 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is not necessary to vouch for the credibility of a named informant in the affidavit
  • “A trial court’s grant of relief from judgment is reviewed generally for an abuse of discretion,” citing People v Osaghae, 460 Mich 529, 534; 596 NW2d 911 [1999], and People v Reed, 198 Mich App 639, 645; 499 NW2d 441 [1993], aff’d 449 Mich 375; 535 NW2d 496 [1995].

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bandstra, Saad, Meter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.