Skip to main content

People v. Turmon

Citations

  • 340 N.W.2d 620
  • 417 Mich. 638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the indisputable proposition that due process requires 2 that citizens “be apprised of conduct which a criminal statute prohibits”
  • controlled substances act creates felonies, no meaningful difference from delegation perspective between felonies and misdemeanors
  • same, but also discussing prior case involving criminal penalties attached to violation of open season declarations regarding birds, fish, and fur-bearing animals
  • same, but also discussing prior case involving criminal penalties attached to violation of open season declarations regarding birds, fish, and fur-bearing animals
  • controlled substances act creates felonies, no meaningful difference from delegation perspective between felonies and misdemeanors
  • same, but also discussing prior case involving criminal penalties attached to violation of open season declarations regarding birds, fish, and fur-bearing animals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanagh, Levin, Ryan, Brickley, Cavanagh, Boyle, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Turmon

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.