People v. Tumolo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inadvertent duplication of defendant resulting in two photographs of him in the same array was not sufficient to compel exclusion
• defendant could be expected to uncover evidence that witness observed someone else shoot victim where witness dated defendant's sister at time of trial
• duplication of defendant’s photograph in an array will not by itself require suppression of identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).