People v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that using the words “m andatory” and “discretionary” to characterize sex of fender parole does not adequately encompass the requirements of t he Act
• recognizing that using the words “m andatory” and “discretionary” to characterize sex of fender parole does not adequately encompass the requirements of t he Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Herdman
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 25×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vensor v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2007-02-05· cited 292×
• People v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2001-06-25· cited 254×
• People v. Tolbert
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-05-03· cited 208×