Skip to main content

People v. Townsend

Citations

  • 62 Cal. App. 4th 1390
  • 73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 438
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2712
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 3715
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a school-zone statute that was ambiguous and susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, was not impermissibly vague because it did not invite arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement by those who administer the statute
  • concluding that a school-zone statute that was ambiguous and susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, was not impermissibly vague because it did not invite arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement by those who administer the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.