People v. Tontorya C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the trial court must make a finding of unfitness as to each child individually
• rejecting the proposition that the nine-month period prescribed by section 1(D)(m) could start before the child was born
• rejecting State’s argument that “unfitness as to one child is unfitness as to all” and holding that when deciding whether a parent is unfit under section l(D)(m)(iii
• rejecting State’s argument that “unfitness as to one child is unfitness as to all”
• rejecting State's argument that \unfitness as to one child is unfitness as to all\ and holding that when deciding whether a parent is unfit under section 1(D)(m)(iii
• rejecting State's argument that “unfitness as to one child is unfitness as to all[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).