People v. Tomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of single interpreter for defendants was sufficient to safeguard right to fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. an Xuan Nguyen
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-21· cited 33×
• People v. Salazar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-28· cited 22×
• Sanchez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-11-20· cited 18×
• Hung v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-01-12· cited 8×
• State v. Gonzales-Morales
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-06-29· cited 7×
• State v. Herrera
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-01-06· cited 3×
• People v. Gorga
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-08· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New York
  Second Circuit· 1970-10-15· cited 173×
• DeRose v. Carswell
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-07· cited 107×
• People v. Aguilar
  California Supreme Court· 1984-04-05· cited 60×
• People v. Chavez
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-10-05· cited 26×
• People v. Menchaca
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-09-12· cited 16×
• Martinez v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-05-23· cited 6×
• People v. Romero
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-03-27· cited 5×