Skip to main content

People v. Todaro

Citations

  • 26 N.Y.2d 325
  • 258 N.E.2d 711
  • 310 N.Y.S.2d 303
  • 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that New York Penal Law § 240.20 “does not require proof of the accomplished fact of public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm; but proof only from which the risk of it, recklessly created, might be inferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Todaro

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.