People v. Tittlebach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• during bench trial, respondent introduced testimony from doctor that addressed element of substantial probability of reoffending
• rejecting respondent’s argument that the State must show a more than 10% recidivism rate as an improper attack on the weight to be given such evidence
• rejecting respondent's argument that the State must show a more then 10 percent recidivism rate as an improper attack on the weight to be given such evidence
• respondent argued on appeal that trial court “should have continued the dispositional hearing to obtain more information on suitable placement”
• trial court was responsible for assessing witness credibility, resolving conflicts in evidence, and drawing reasonable inferences from the evidence
• trial court was responsible for assessing witness credibility, resolving conflicts in evidence, and drawing reasonable inferences from the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).