Skip to main content

People v. Till

Citations

  • 661 N.E.2d 153
  • 87 N.Y.2d 835
  • 637 N.Y.S.2d 681
  • 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 4434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[S]uch evidence may be allowed when, as here, it bears on the motive and state of mind in relation to an avoidance of apprehension during immediate flight from a crime and is found to be ‘needed as background material’ or to ‘complete the narrative of the episode’ ”
  • Evidence of uncharged crimes may be allowed when ... it bears on the motive and state of mind in relation to an avoidance of apprehension during immediate flight from a crime and is found to be “needed as background material” or to “complete the narrative of the episode[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa and Levine Concur Judges Smith and Ciparick Dissent and Vote to Affirm for the Reasons Stated in the Opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (201 Ad2d 43)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

161 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Till

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.