People v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in construing an interstate compact regarding supervision of parolees, the court recognized that “there is nothing in the compact to compel a state to receive a parolee____ There is, therefore, no basis upon which this Court may compel that consent be given”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aveline v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-14· cited 38×
• In Re Adoption No. 10087
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-30· cited 20×
• State v. Rosado
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-02-25· cited 17×
• Gordon v. Watley
  S.D. New York· 1986-01-10· cited 2×
• People ex rel. White v. Abrams
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-03-19
• People ex rel. Johnson v. Batista
  New York Supreme Court· 1995-11-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Santos
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1969-04-08· cited 27×
• People v. Santos
  New York Court of Appeals· 1969-10-29· cited 16×
• Menechino v. Division of Parole
  New York Court of Appeals· 1970-02-26· cited 13×
• Menechino v. Division of Parole
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1969-06-17· cited 12×
• Santos v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 8×