People v. Thomas Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \it does not follow that bargaining regarding the fate of a member of defendant's family does not constitute coercion\
• “it does not follow that bargaining regarding the fate of a member of defendant’s family does not constitute coercion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Solano
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 17×
• People v. Duran
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1972-07-03· cited 9×
• People v. Forrest
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-03-26· cited 5×
• People v. Doerfer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-04-26· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• People v. Hollman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-12-10· cited 28×