People v. Tennon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the failure to make the tabulation in the presence of the defendant, a “ministerial duty,” did not amount to error requiring reversal.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Gist
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-04-16· cited 34×
• People v. Lucas
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-04-16· cited 26×
• In re Forfeiture of $25,505
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-12-20· cited 15×
• People v. Pipok
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-11-04· cited 14×
• People v. Sobczak-Obetts
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-02-23· cited 11×
• People v. Myers
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-10· cited 10×
• United States v. Wolfe
  E.D. Michigan· 1999-01-13· cited 4×
• People v. Jagotka
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-01-15· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Elkins v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
• State v. Cortman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-10-23· cited 80×
• People v. Phillips
  California Court of Appeal· 1958-09-15· cited 31×
• United States v. Callahan
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1927-03-04· cited 20×
• People v. Fisk
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-07-22· cited 9×
• City of Muskegon v. Lipman Investment Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-01-06· cited 8×

Other cases named People v. Tennon

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Tennon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1971-08-26· cited 1×