People v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Finding that [the detective’s] communications were not intended or anticipated to evoke inculpatory declarations, we reiterate the established principle that the police are not required to silence [a] chatterbox.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wilhelm
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-08-24· cited 166×
• People v. Higgins
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-01-08· cited 23×
• People v. Gomez
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-06-21
• American Samoa Government v. Uli
  High Court of American Samoa· 2004-04-13
• People v. Bonilla
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2024-07-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Lynes
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-01-15· cited 230×
• People v. Sturkey
  New York Court of Appeals· 1991-05-09· cited 20×
• People v. Peraza
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-11-21· cited 18×
• People v. Krzykowski
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-04-18· cited 18×
• People v. Kirby
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-02-08· cited 10×
• People v. Sturdivant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-11-09· cited 8×
• People v. Hogabone
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-12-07· cited 7×
• People v. Pena
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-03-23· cited 5×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-06-17· cited 5×
• People v. Snide
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-12-17· cited 3×