People v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting defendant’s question about what would happen to him if he pleaded “no contest” to the pending complaint
• admitting defendant's question about what would happen to him if he pleaded \no contest\ to the pending complaint
• admitting defendant's question about what would happen to him if he pleaded \no contest\ to the pending complaint
• defendant’s hypothetical question — “if [I] went to court and would plead no contest *** what would happen[?]” — merely demonstrated that defendant was seeking information, and did not contain the rudiments of the negotiation process
• defendant’s hypothetical question–“if [I] went to court and would plead no contest *** what would happen[?]”–merely demonstrated that defendant was seeking information, and did not contain the rudiments of the negotiation process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hart
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 63×
• People v. Wanke
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-03-24· cited 20×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-03· cited 18×
• People v. Gillespie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-29· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Friedman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 148×
• People v. Garriott
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-11-30· cited 63×
• People v. Connolly
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-07-27· cited 25×
• People v. Burns
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-28· cited 21×
• People v. Tennin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-24· cited 20×
• People v. Victory
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-27· cited 19×
• People v. Rolih
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-09-04· cited 12×