Skip to main content

People v. Taylor

Citations

  • 655 P.2d 382
  • 1982 Colo. LEXIS 744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e have repeatedly recognized that direct proof of the defendant’s state of mind is rarely available and, consequently, resort must necessarily be had to circumstantial evidence on this element.”
  • “[W]e have repeatedly recognized that direct proof of the defendant’s state of mind is rarely available and, 20 consequently, resort must necessarily be had to circumstantial evidence on this element.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.