Skip to main content

Citations

  • 177 A.D.2d 674
  • 576 N.Y.S.2d 368
  • 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding, correctly, that “there was undisputed evidence that [Arlene] was in a coma after the defendant’s attack, and will remain confined to a wheelchair for the rest of her life”
  • “Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court did not err by denying his application to submit assault in the second degree to the jury as a lesser included offense of assault in the first degree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Tatta

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.