Skip to main content

People v. Tate

Citations

  • 712 N.E.2d 826
  • 305 Ill. App. 3d 607
  • 238 Ill. Dec. 722
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the defendant made a substantial showing that counsel was ineffective where identification was at issue, but counsel failed to present the testimony of three alibi witnesses and there was no apparent strategy for not presenting their testimony
  • there was no reason not to call alibi witnesses when witness affidavits supported defendant’s theory of misidentification
  • counsel may be deemed ineffective for failure to present exculpatory evidence of which he is aware
  • unable to determine “as a matter of law” whether defense counsel’s decision to not call certain witnesses was a “professionally reasonable tactical decision” because the record did not reflect counsel’s reasoning for the decision
  • unable to determine \as a matter of law\ whether defense counsel's decision to not call certain witnesses was a \professionally reasonable tactical decision\ because the record did not reflect counsel's reasoning for the decision
  • defendant’s postconviction petition included affidavits of three alibi witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.