People v. Szpara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s argument that he could not be charged with breaking and entering when the dwelling he allegedly broke into was the marital home
• affirming defendant’s conviction for breaking and entering own home because court order that defendant not enter the home temporarily stripped him of his possessory rights in the home
• rejecting the “defendant’s argument that he could not be charged with breaking and entering his own home” because “[h]e was prevented by court order from entering the marital home” and thus “had lost, at least at the time of this incident, whatever rights he had to enter the home”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).