People v. Swaggirt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for a constitutional error to be harmless, it must be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
• for a constitutional error to be harmless, it must be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
• just as the Chambers factors are not prerequisites, satisfaction “of one or more of the factors does not make a statement trustworthy”
• statements made within 24 hours were made “shortly after the crime occurred” for purposes of the first Chambers factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).