Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/1/2000

People v. Sutherland

Citations

743 N.E.2d 1007
252 Ill. Dec. 851
317 Ill. App. 3d 1117
2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “one imperfect response to a question is insufficient to invalidate a finding of competency in light of the totality of the responses”
declaring the motions by petitioner “for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the order denying petition for leave to appeal” and also for “reconsideration” to be “allowed,” vacating the order denying the petition, and allowing the petition for leave to appeal
all finding section 5 — 8—4(a) of the Code constitutional and affirming defendants’ consecutive sentences thereunder
where Apprendi was held inapplicable because section 5 — 8— 4(a) criteria do not increase the sentence beyond the prescribed statutory maximum
six-year-old shooting victim was found competent to testify in prosecution for attempted murder and battery with a firearm, even though she stated that “telling the truth made people ‘happy’ ” and lying made them “ ‘mad’ ”
all finding section 5–8–4(a) of the Code constitutional and affirming defendants’ consecutive sentences thereunder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.