People v. Suazo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant contacting the victim numerous times in person and by telephone repeatedly asking to see her was conduct connected to a prior threat to kill the victim if she did not see him
• noting sufficient evidence of credible threat where the “defendant told the victim that he was going to kill her if she did not see him”
• finding an instruction 22 erroneous when the mens rea element of “knowingly” was included in only one of the two conduct elements
• jury instructions held improper because the mens rea of knowingly was not listed as a stand-alone element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wagner
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 320×
• People v. Carey
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-04-17· cited 25×
• People v. Summitt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2006-03-20· cited 10×
• People v. Chase
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-03-14· cited 9×
• People v. Crumb
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 6×
• People v. Gomez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2008-09-04· cited 5×
• People v. Pernell
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 5×
• People v. Gibbons
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-09-15· cited 3×
• Peo v. Harmon
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2025-04-10· cited 1×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee,v.Richard Alfred STROCK, Defendant–Appellant.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-08-19