People v. Stubbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant “ignored his right to be present” at suppression hearing “by virtue of his voluntary absence”
• no error in proceeding with suppression motion without defendant where defendant “was represented by counsel who had adequate opportunity” to cross-examine witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tiller
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-15· cited 24×
• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-11-14· cited 22×
• People v. Pace
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-26· cited 19×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-09· cited 15×
• People v. Davis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-14· cited 8×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Clay
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-11-20· cited 190×
• The PEOPLE v. Mallett
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 55×
• The PEOPLE v. Steenbergen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-11-24· cited 54×
• People v. Meschino
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-02-22· cited 2×