People v. Strohman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]roperty acquired through fraud, for example, would not fall under the definition of receiving stolen proper- ty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Reed
  California Supreme Court· 2006-07-03· cited 395×
• People v. Sanchez
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-11-13· cited 109×
• Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-15· cited 23×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Ortega
  California Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 229×
• People v. King
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-06-09· cited 15×