· 8/19/2010
People v. Strock
Citations
- 252 P.3d 1148
- 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 1172
- 2010 WL 3259736
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to object is a factor that may be considered in examining whether prosecutor's argument rises to the level of plain error
- a prosecutor in closing argument may ordinarily use rhetorical devices and a reviewing court considers the frequency of alleged misconduct
- no plain error where misstatements were offset by the prosecutor’s correct statements of law, the trial court’s correct instructions, and counsel’s reference to the court’s instructions 32 during closing
- for crimes determined to be grave and serious per se, court conducting proportionality review need consider only harshness of penalty
- “A prosecutor has wide latitude to make arguments based on facts in evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts.”
- “A prosecutor has wide latitude to make arguments based on facts in evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taubman, Rovira, Criswell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.