Skip to main content
· 8/19/2010

People v. Strock

Citations

  • 252 P.3d 1148
  • 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 1172
  • 2010 WL 3259736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to object is a factor that may be considered in examining whether prosecutor's argument rises to the level of plain error
  • a prosecutor in closing argument may ordinarily use rhetorical devices and a reviewing court considers the frequency of alleged misconduct
  • no plain error where misstatements were offset by the prosecutor’s correct statements of law, the trial court’s correct instructions, and counsel’s reference to the court’s instructions 32 during closing
  • for crimes determined to be grave and serious per se, court conducting proportionality review need consider only harshness of penalty
  • “A prosecutor has wide latitude to make arguments based on facts in evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts.”
  • “A prosecutor has wide latitude to make arguments based on facts in evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Rovira, Criswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.