People v. Storr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though the drug was found in a van which was not owned or driven by the defendant, the prosecution introduced sufficient evidence to associate the defendant with the drug
• “[E] ven though a defendant does not have marijuana on his person, constr uctive possession may be proved by showing that the ‘marijuana . . . was at a place at least partially under his dominion and control .’”
• “[E] ven though a defendant does not have marijuana on his person, constr uctive possession may be proved by showing that the ‘marijuana . . . was at a place at least partially under his dominion and control .’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).