Skip to main content

People v. Stork

Citations

  • 713 N.E.2d 187
  • 305 Ill. App. 3d 714
  • 238 Ill. Dec. 941
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute prohibiting child sex offenders from being in school zones without permission proscribed only that specific conduct and did not reach innocent conduct as well
  • finding requirements under SORA did not implicate any protected liberty interests
  • “If a group of persons creates a greater danger to the public, then it is reasonable to deter those persons by a statute reasonably designed to remedy the threat to the public safety”
  • finding section 9.3 did not implicate any protected liberty interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Stork

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.