People v. Stiles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it “is fundamental that a defendant is entitled to a full and fair hearing on [a] motion to suppress”
• “It is fundamental that a defendant is entitled to a full and fair hearing on [a] motion to suppress.”
• “It is fundamental that a defendant is entitled to a full and fair hearing -6- 1-25-0023 on [a] motion to suppress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Levasseur
  D. Massachusetts· 1988-03-18· cited 27×
• Stevenson v. City of Chicago
  N.D. Illinois· 1986-06-12· cited 13×
• People v. Griffin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-08-16· cited 12×
• People v. Weilmuenster
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-16· cited 7×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-21· cited 6×
• People v. Ward
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-04· cited 2×
• People v. Berry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-06-05

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harrison v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 805×
• People v. Hopkins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 122×
• People v. Goerger
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 77×
• The PEOPLE v. Robinson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-09-29· cited 46×
• People v. Holland
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1974-01-31· cited 35×
• People v. Mordican
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 34×
• People v. Wilson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-03-24· cited 30×
• Roy Brown v. William J. Scott
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-08-02· cited 25×
• People v. Coss
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-02-02· cited 13×
• Brown v. Scott
  N.D. Illinois· 1978-09-27· cited 8×
• People v. Curvin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-02-27· cited 8×