People v. Stice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• document entitled “Motion to Dismiss” treated as a motion to suppress because the “court prefers to exalt substance over form”
• document entitled \Motion to Dismiss\ treated as a motion to suppress because the \court prefers to exalt substance over form\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Moore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-26· cited 101×
• People v. McClure
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 91×
• People v. Scullark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-10-30· cited 45×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-16· cited 16×
• People v. Flynn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-20· cited 11×
• People v. Filitti
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-11-09· cited 10×
• Elliott v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2011-02-24· cited 10×
• People v. Hackman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-02-14· cited 6×
• Hurlbert v. Charles
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-09-23
• People v. Scullark Modification of March 13, 2001, opinion upon denial of rehearing
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-10-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• MacKey v. Montrym
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 746×
• Hoffman v. Hoffman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1928-04-21· cited 105×
• The PEOPLE v. Haran
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-02-01· cited 35×
• People Ex Rel. Eppinga v. Edgar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-04-18· cited 26×
• People v. Borchers
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 18×