People v. Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant did not have “a reasonable expectation of privacy in the quantity of electricity delivered by the utility to [his] house”
• finding that defendant did not have \a reasonable expectation of privacy in the quantity of electricity delivered by the utility to [his] house\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Domicz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-09-20· cited 104×
• People v. Garcia
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-08-26· cited 18×
• People v. Wilson
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-30· cited 5×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Smith v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
• Welsh v. Wisconsin
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
• Steagald v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 1,585×
• California v. Greenwood
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
• United States v. Karo
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 895×
• United States v. Knotts
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 749×
• People v. Ramey
  California Supreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 416×
• People v. Williams
  California Supreme Court· 1988-07-11· cited 365×
• Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Administrator
  Supreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 341×
• Wimberly v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1976-03-19· cited 138×
• People v. Tuadles
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-07-09· cited 29×
• People v. Deutsch
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-04-24· cited 24×
• People v. Terrones
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-07-18· cited 13×