People v. Stahlman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusion of a contract that had “bearing upon the issues in the case” was “manifestly prejudicial”
• reversing district court’s exclusion of an invalid contract signed by the parties because the “contract, although invalid and illegal, should have been admitted as bearing upon the truthfulness of plaintiff’s testimony and upon her character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).