People v. Sprosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[t]o determine whether vacatur is warranted,” courts “need only ask whether the amendment should be granted”
• holding that “loss causation may be pleaded on the theory that the truth gradually emerged through a series of partial disclosures and that an entire series of partial disclosures prompted the stock price deflation”
• noting that the district court “may deny leave . . . if the proposed amended complaint fails to satisfy the requirements of the federal rules”
• holding the court may deny leave to amend “if the proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim under the applicable rules and accompanying standards.”
• stating that Rule 9(b) applies to Section 10(b) elements for which the PSLRA does not impose a higher standard
• providing courts may deny leave to amend “if the proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim under the applicable rules and accompanying standards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).