People v. Splett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding State could pursue involuntary admission against a voluntary patient only after the voluntary patient made a written request for discharge, and rejecting an oral request as sufficient under the statute
• holding State could pursue involuntary admission against a voluntary patient only after the voluntary patient made a written request for discharge, and rejecting an oral request as sufficient under the statute
• holding State could pursue involuntary admission against a voluntary patient only after the voluntary patient made a written request for discharge, and rejecting an oral request as sufficient under the statute
• finding reversal was not warranted despite lack of formal notice to the respondent since respondent's actual notice of the proceedings satisfied the purposes of section 3-706
• finding reversal was not warranted despite lack of formal notice to the respondent since respondent’s actual notice of the proceedings satisfied the purposes of section 3 — 706
• applying the exception because collateral consequences related to the stigma of an involuntary admission may confront respondent in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).