People v. Spitzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \[b]y using such mathematical odds the prosecutor `confuse[d] the probability of concurrence of the identifying marks with the probability of mistaken identification'\
• finding that “[b]y using such mathematical odds the prosecutor ‘confuse[d] the probability of concurrence of the identifying marks with the probability of mistaken identification’ ”
• improper use of scientific testimony regarding hair samples

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).