People v. Sotelo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a statute is ambiguous as to the allowable unit of prosecution, the court must adopt a construction that favors the defendant.” (internal quotations and citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of West Virginia v. Ronald Goins
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-09-12· cited 13×
• State v. Balch
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-01-29· cited 10×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
• People v. King
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
• United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 657×
• People v. Gutman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 146×
• People v. Agnew
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-01-23· cited 141×
• People v. Segara
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-12-06· cited 98×
• People v. Manning
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-03-23· cited 92×
• United States v. Edwin Kinsley, United States of America v. Michael Guerra
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-06-27· cited 91×
• United States v. Albert Verrecchia
  First Circuit· 1999-11-19· cited 89×
• People v. Carter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 88×
• People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 84×
• Pruitt v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-11-09· cited 47×
• People v. Carter
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-12-14· cited 16×
• People v. Bouchee
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-06· cited 11×
• People v. Hagler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-11· cited 9×