Skip to main content
· 9/15/2017

People v. Sosa (Jose)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Walling’s “common sense view has never been challenged”
  • analyzing whether certain third-party bonuses qualified as remuneration when those bonuses were paid by a “large natural gas production company” to the employees of the defendant, “a small excavation [company]”
  • “[W]hether a payment qualifies as renumeration for employment depends on the employer’s and employee’s agreement.”
  • “‘[A] fair reading’ of the FLSA, neither narrow nor broad, is what is called for.” (quoting id.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.