Skip to main content
· 6/29/1984

People v. Solzak

Citations

  • 466 N.E.2d 1201
  • 126 Ill. App. 3d 119
  • 81 Ill. Dec. 399
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 2110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Noticeably absent from the [implied-consent] statute is any exception to the rule for lack of knowing refusal, and we will not create such an exception by judicial fiat.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGILLICUDDY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.