California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 6/15/2018
People v. Smit
Citations
- 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 554
- 24 Cal. App. 5th 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Proposition 64 “generally” reduced offense of possessing marijuana for sale from felony to misdemeanor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-01-29· cited 560×
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-20· cited 324×
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-02-08· cited 161×
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-14· cited 126×
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-11-18· cited 16×
- People v. SmitCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-03-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.