People v. Siwek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the 1994 amendment to the statute “extended the coverage of the eavesdropping statute to all conversations, regardless of whether [the conversations] were intended to be private”
• where consent is given by one party to the conversation, the other party has no legitimate expectation of privacy and eavesdropping does not occur
• where consent is given by one party to the conversation, the other party has no legitimate expectation of privacy and eavesdropping does not occur

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).