· 4/21/1921
People v. Sisk
Citations
- 297 Ill. 314
- 130 N.E. 696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Appellant’s failure to comply with Trial Rule 9.2(B) procedures did not preclude trial court from allowing Appellant to present evidence at trial that the altered agreement was a unilateral alteration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.