Skip to main content
· 4/21/1921

People v. Sisk

Citations

  • 297 Ill. 314
  • 130 N.E. 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Appellant’s failure to comply with Trial Rule 9.2(B) procedures did not preclude trial court from allowing Appellant to present evidence at trial that the altered agreement was a unilateral alteration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.