People v. Simmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statement had not been sufficiently attenuated from the defendant's illegal arrest when held for 38 hours, subjected to flagrant police misconduct, and had no intervening circumstances
• “We agree with defendant’s assertion that officers rounded up defendant and then conducted a fishing expedition in order to establish probable cause”
• witness found through defendant’s statement during unlawful detention is not a sufficient intervening circumstance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Maldonado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-18· cited 39×
• People v. McCullough
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-10-02· cited 33×
• People v. Jackson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-22· cited 23×
• People v. Ruhl
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-09-21· cited 20×
• People v. Salgado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-17· cited 9×
• People v. Island
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-09-17· cited 5×
• People v. Maldonado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-10· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
• People v. Ward
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 289×
• People v. Enis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 256×
• People v. Foskey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 253×
• People v. Lekas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-03-17· cited 74×
• People v. Jennings
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-05-20· cited 37×
• People v. Graham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-05-24· cited 33×
• People v. Bracy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-29· cited 22×
• People v. Bates
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-10-27· cited 20×
• People v. Clay
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-21· cited 18×