People v. Sidney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for reconsideration in light of Pickering, but indicating that on present state of evidence employee’s speech was unprotected
• remanding for reconsideration in light of Pickering, but indicating that on present state of evidence employee's speech was unprotected
• “[a government] employee . . . cannot reasonably assert a right to keep his job while at the same time he inveighs against his superiors in public with intemperate and defamatory [statements]”
• scope of inquiry on remand enlarged in light of Pickering, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).