Skip to main content

People v. Shepard

Citations

  • 151 P.3d 580
  • 2006 Colo. App. LEXIS 1093
  • 2006 WL 1914093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding defendant’s due process claim, brought under Crim. P. 35(a), was cognizable under Crim. P. 35(c) only
  • concluding defendant's due process claim, brought under Crim. P. 35(a), was cognizable under Crim. P. 35(c) only
  • considering defendant’s Crim. P. 35(a) motion as a 35(c) motion based on its content
  • considering defendant's Crim. P. 35(a) motion as a 35(c) motion based on its content
  • considering defendant's Crim. P. 35(a) motion as a 35(c) motion based on its content
  • applying section 16-5-402(1) to a probation revocation challenge cognizable under Crim. P. 35(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Carparelli, Román

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.