People v. Shawn G.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that completion of a 2010 horse roundup did not render plaintiff’s preliminary injunction challenge moot because it could apply to future roundups
• explaining that “events subsequent to the filing of the case [that] resolve the parties’ dispute” render a case moot (citation omitted)
• recognizing First Amendment protection for “the press and public to observe government activities”
• calling for inquiry into history of public access to horse gathers, not to federal lands
• remanding for the district court to perform the Press-Enterprise II test
• “The government argues that the Press-Enterprise I framework is limited to attempts to access criminal trials. We disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).