People v. Shah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that AEDPA review and deference in such a situation should extend to state trial court findings
• noting that state court factual findings are presumed correct unless the habeas petitioner rebuts them through clear and convincing evidence
• reviewing a Batson third step analysis under § 2254(d)(2) and declining to consider § 2254(b)(1
• explaining that to satisfy § 2254(d)(2
• “the credibility findings a trial court makes in a Batson inquiry are reviewed for clear error”
• factual determinations of state trial and appellate courts are presumed to be correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).